Williams v Waterman
Jurisdiction | Caribbean States |
Judgment Date | 1961 |
Date | 1961 |
Year | 1961 |
Court | Federal Supreme Court (West Indies) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Sookraj v Ceres
...that in law there was no evidence to support the charge. This, in my judgment, was a wrong conclusion on a point of law…” 13 Williams v. Waterman (1961) 3 W.I.R. 499 was a decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Archer, C.J., Wylie and Lewis, JJ.). The appellant was convicted in the Magis......
-
McClean v the Barbados Telephone Company Ltd
...“the Board made a legal error” to bring the matters raised in this appeal within the category of questions of law [see per Wylie J. in Williams v. Waterman (1961) 3 W.I.R. 499]. The grounds fairly stated must genuinely raise a question of law. 22 As to what constitutes a question of law, th......
-
McClean v Barbados Light and Power Company Ltd
...“the Board made a legal error” to bring the matters raised in this appeal within the category of questions of law [see per Wylie J. in Williams v. Waterman (1961) 3 W.I.R. 499. The grounds fairly stated must genuinely raise a question of law. 6 As to what constitutes a question of law, the ......
-
Rolle v Attorney General
...a point of law alone but not upon any question of fact or of mixed fact and law. 5 In the decision of the Federal Supreme Court in Williams v. Waterman (1961) 3 W.I.R. 499, Wylie J. had this to say at page 501, letters D and E:– “The second ground alleges that the Court of Appeal erred in l......
Request a trial to view additional results