Vanterpool and Others v Crown Attorney and Another
| Jurisdiction | Caribbean States |
| Judgment Date | 1961 |
| Date | 1961 |
| Year | 1961 |
| Court | Obsolete Court (Caribbean) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
HMB Holdings Ltd v Cabinet of Antigua and Barbuda
...prescribes shall be conclusive evidence that the land to which it relates is required for a public purpose. As Lewis J observed in Vanterpool v Crown Attorney (1961) 3 WIR 351, 355, if it is proposed to acquire any land under the subsection by compulsory process there are two questions that......
-
Wendell Nichols Claimant v Attorney General Commissioner of Police Defendants
...on the ground that it was manifestly without foundation. He was right to do so, but the principle extends further than that:Vanterpool v Crown Attorney (1961) 3 WIR 351, per Lewis J at pp 366–367. As Lord Wilberforce explained inAnisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147,......
-
Wendell Nichols Claimant v Attorney General Commissioner of Police Defendants
...on the ground that it was manifestly without foundation. He was right to do so, but the principle extends further than that:Vanterpool v Crown Attorney (1961) 3 WIR 351, per Lewis J at pp 366–367. As Lord Wilberforce explained inAnisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147,......
-
Wendell Nichols v Attorney General Commissioner of Police
...on the ground that it was manifestly without foundation. He was right to do so, but the principle extends further than that: Vanterpool v Crown Attorney (1961) 3 WIR 351, per Lewis J at pp 366–367. As Lord Wilberforce explained in Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147......
Request a trial to view additional results