The Queen Appellant v Mitchell Ken O'Neal Lewis Respondent
| Jurisdiction | Caribbean States |
| Judge | Justices Nelson,Saunders,Bernard,Wit,Hayton,Mr Justice Michael de la Bastide,Mr Justice Pollard,Mr Justice Nelson,Mr Justice Saunders,Mme Justice Bernard,Mr Justice Wit,Mr Justice Hayton,Mr. Justice Pollard |
| Judgment Date | 04 June 2007 |
| Neutral Citation | [2007] CCJ 3 AJ |
| Docket Number | CCJ Appeal No CR. 1 of 2006 |
| Court | Caribbean Court of Justice (Appellate Jurisdiction) |
| Date | 04 June 2007 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
René Holder-Mcclean-Ramirez v The Attorney General of Barbados
...They cited The Attorney General and others v Joseph and Boyce [2006] CCJ 3 (AJ), Reyes v R. [2002] UKPC 11, The Queen v Lewis [2007] CCJ 3 (AJ), and The Maya Leaders Alliance etal. v The Attorney General of Belize [2015] CCJ 15 (AJ) to bolster that viewpoint. According to them, there are s......
-
Rohan Fisher v Attorney General of Jamaica
...for the guaranteed rights” (see paragraph 3–020). The authors also noted Pollard J's statement in R v Mitchell Ken O'Neal Lewis [2007] CCJ 3 (AJ) that Caribbean Constitutions are organic “living instrument[s]” that are “always speaking”. Indeed, the authors recognised and underscored the di......
-
Vaughn O'Neil Bignall v The General Legal Council
...Brooks JA cited with approval at paras. [13] and [14], dicta of de la Bastide PCCJ and Pollard JCCJ in R v Mitchell Lewis [2007] CCJ 3 (AJ), (2007) 70 WIR 75 as to how the determination is to proceed. The learned President, with whom five of the other Justices agreed in Mitchell Lewis said......
-
Dianne Jhamilly Hadeed v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
...theories and contemporary standards and values typically using international human rights standards as an index.” See R v Lewis [2007] CCJ 3 (AJ). Indeed Justice Saunders remarked in R v Hughes “we would be embarking upon a perilous path if we began to regard the circumstances of each terri......
Request a trial to view additional results