The Attorney General of Guyana v Monica Thomas; Bharrat Jagdeo v Monica Thomas
| Jurisdiction | Caribbean States |
| Court | Caribbean Court of Justice |
| Judge | Justices Wit,Anderson,Rajnauth-Lee,Barrow,Jamadar,Mr Justice Anderson,Mr Justice Anderson, JCCJ |
| Judgment Date | 13 May 2022 |
| Docket Number | CCJ Appeal No GYCV2022/001 GY Civil Appeal No 21 of 2021 |
[2022] CCJ 15 (AJ) GY
Mr Justice Wit, JCCJ
Mr Justice Anderson, JCCJ
Mme Justice Rajnauth-Lee, JCCJ
Mr Justice Barrow, JCCJ
Mr Justice Jamadar, JCCJ
CCJ Appeal No GYCV2022/001
CCJ Appeal No GYCV2022/002
GY Civil Appeal No 21 of 2021
ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF GUYANA
Constitutional law — Jurisdiction — Court of Appeal — Election petition struck out by High Court for improper/late service — Petitioners appealed — Court of Appeal decided it had jurisdiction to hear appeal — Circumstances in which Court of Appeal may have jurisdiction — Whether majority of Court ofAppeal rightly determined it had jurisdiction — Whether decision of ChiefJustice final or interlocutory in context ofright ofappeal under s 6(2) of Constitution — Constitution of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana 1980, art 163 — Court of Appeal Act, Cap 3:01, s 6(2) — National Assembly (Validity of Elections) Act, Cap 1:04 — National Assembly (Validity ofElections) Rules.
A-G v Joseph [2006] CCJ 3 (AJ), (2006) 69 WIR 104 (BB); A-G v Maharaj (Trinidad and Tobago HC, 2 August 2017); A-G of Grenada v David (Grenada CA, 2 June 2008); Aikman v Belize Bank Ltd (Belize CA, 18 May 1992); Ali v David [2020] CCJ 10 (AJ) GY, (2020) 99 WIR 363; American Life Insurance and North American Life Insurance Co Ltd, Re [2001–2002] GLR 157; Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp [1948] 1 KB 223; Bata Shoe Co (Guyana) Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue (1976) 24 WIR 172; Belize International Services Ltd v A-G of Belize [2020] CCJ 9 (AJ) BZ, [2021] 1 LRC 36; Bell v DPP of Jamaica [1985] 2 All ER 585 (JM PC); Bico Ltd v Mcdonald Farms Ltd (Barbados CA, 1 November 1996); Bisram v DPP [2022] CCJ 7 AJ (GY); Boodram v A-G of Trinidad and Tobago [1996] AC 842 (TT PC); Bozson v Altrincham Urban District Council [1903] 1 KB 547; Browne v Francis-Gibson (1995) 50 WIR 143; Chung v AIC Battery and Automotive Services Co Ltd (Guyana CA, 23 May 2011); Chung v AIC Battery and Automotive Services Co Ltd [2013] CCJ 2 (AJ) (GY), (2013) 82 WIR 357; Commissioner of Police v Alleyne [2022] CCJ 2 (AJ) BB, [2022] 2 LRC 590; Cuffy v Skerrit (Dominica CA, 28 April 2021), Cuffy v Skerrit [2022] CCJ 12 (AJ) DM; Day v Governor of the Cayman Islands [2022] 3 LRC 557; Delorie v Government [2017] 3 LRC 429; Delph v Chief Election Officer [2003-2004] GLR 29; Exeter v Gaymes (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines CA, 13 June 2017); Frampton v Pinard (Dominica CA, 3 April 2006); Ghana Independent Broadcasters Association v A-G [2018] 4 LRC 1; Gibson v A-G of Barbados [2010] CCJ 3 (AJ) (BB), (2010) 76 WIR 137; Govind v The State 2003 IIIAD (Delhi) 525; Grant v Phillip (Saint Kitts and Nevis HC, 4 November 2010); Green v Saint Jean (Dominica HC, 7 June 2011); Guyana Consumers' Advisory Bureau v Public Utilities Commission (Guyana CA, 17 February 1999); Habet v Penner (Belize SC, 4 May 2012); Hamilton v Liburd (Saint Christopher and Nevis CA, 3 April 2006); Haron Bin Mohamed Zaid v Central Securities (Holdings) Bhd [1983] 1 AC 16; Hill v Sagicor Life Inc [2018] CCJ 22 (AJ) (BB); Hinds v R (1975) 24 WIR 326; Jacpot Ltd v Gambling Regulatory Authority [2018] UKPC 16, [2018] LLR 754; Jonas v Quinn- Leandro (Antigua and Barbuda HC, 31 March 2010); Jones v Barnes 103 S Ct 3308 (1983); Joseph v Reynolds (Saint Lucia CA, 31 July 2012); LeGroulx v Pitre [2008] OJ No 443; Locabail (UK) Ltd v Bayfield Properties Ltd [2000] QB 451; Marin v R [2021] CCJ 6 (AJ) BZ; Matthew v The State [2004] UKPC 33, (2004) 64 WIR 412 (TT); Maya Leaders Alliance v A-G of Belize [2015] CCJ 15 (AJ) (BZ), (2015) 87 WIR 178; McDonna v Richardson (Anguilla CA, 29 June 2007); McEwan v A-G of Guyana [2018] CCJ 30 (AJ) GY, (2019) 94 WIR 332; McKane v Durston 153 US 684 (1894); Meerabux v A-G of Belize (2005) 66 WIR 113 (PC); Melville v Chief Elections Officer (Guyana HC, 16 February 2010); Minister of Home Affairs v Fisher [1980] AC 319; Mist v R [2006] 3 NZLR 145; Mithani v Assistant Collector of Customs 1967 AIR 1639; Moran v Lloyd's [1983] 2 All ER 200; Narula Trading Agency v Commissioner of Sales Tax Delhi 1981 AIR Delhi 1; Nervais v R [2018] CCJ 19 (AJ) (BB), (2018) 92 WIR 178; Nova Scotia Manufacturing v Narine (2015) 85 WIR 423; Olasemo v Barnett Ltd (1995) 51 WIR 191; Payne v Hammond (Guyana HC, 5 June 1986); Persaud v Lowenfield (Guyana HC, 19 February 2016); Persaud v Nizamudin [2020] CCJ 4 (AJ) (GY); Peters v A-G (2001) 63 WIR 244; Petrie v A-G (1968) 14 WIR 292; Pla v Andorra (2004) 18 BHRC 120; Prashad v Persaud [2022] CCJ 5 (AJ) GY; Prevost v Blackmore (Dominica HC, 14 September 2005); Quinn-Leandro v Jonas (2010) 78 WIR 216; R v Flowers [2020] CCJ 16 (AJ) BZ, [2020] 5 LRC 628; R (Woolas) v Parliamentary Election Court [2012] QB 1; Ram v A-G [2019] CCJ 10 (AJ) (GY), (2019) 97 WIR 266; Ramcharran v DPP [2022] CCJ 4 (AJ) GY; Rees v Crane (1994) 43 WIR 444 (TT PC); Rehman v Khan [2015] EWHC 4168 (Admin); Russell v AG of St Vincent and the Grenadines (1995) 50 WIR 127; Salaman v Warner [1891] 1 QB 734; Salter Rex & Co v Ghosh [1971] 2 QB 597; Sampanthan v A-G [2019] 5 LRC 29; Singh v Perreira (Guyana CA, 11 November 1998); Skerrit v Defoe [2021] CCJ 4 (AJ) DM; Smith v A-G of Trinidad and Tobago [2022] UKPC 28; Smith v Christopher (British Virgin Islands HC, 23 July 2003); Strachan v Gleaner Co Ltd (Jamaica CA, 18 December 1998); Summerlin Ltd v Reneau (Belize CA, 27 October 2017); Sylvester v Singh (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines CA, 18 September 1995); Thomas v A-G of Trinidad and Tobago [1982] AC 113; Thomas v Lowenfield (Guyana CA, 21 December 2021); Trinidad and Tobago Police Service Association v Chief Personnel Officer (Trinidad and Tobago CA, 12 December 1983); Tyson v R (2017) 92 WIR 328; Walker v James (Antigua and Barbuda HC, 15 March 2018); Wallace-Whitfield v Hanna (Bahamas CA, 28 October 1982); White v Brunton [1984] 2 All ER 606; Williams v Giraudy (1975) 22 WIR 532; Williams v Mayor of Tenby (1879) 5 CPD 135; Williams and Salisbury, Re [1978] 26 WIR 133.
Antigua and Barbuda— Constitution of Antigua and Barbuda 1981, Representation of the People Act, Cap 379; The Bahamas — Constitution of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas 1973, Parliamentary Elections Act, CH 7; Barbados — Constitution of Barbados 1966; Belize — Belize Constitution Act, Cap 4, Representation of the People Act, Cap 9; Dominica — Constitution of the Commonwealth of Dominica 1978, House of Assembly (Elections) Act, Chap 2:01; Grenada — Grenada Constitution Act, CAP 128A, Representation of the People Act, CAP 286A; Guyana — Civil Procedure Rules 2016; Constitution of Guyana and the Election Laws (Amendment) Act 2000, Order 60/2020, Constitution of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana Act, Cap 1:01, Court of Appeal Act, Cap 3:01, High Court Act, Cap 3:02, National Assembly (Validity of Elections) Act, Cap 1:04, National Assembly (Validity of Elections) Rules, Cap 1:04; Jamaica — Constitution of Jamaica 1962, Election Petitions Act, Representation of the People Act; Saint Christopher and Nevis — Constitution of Saint Christopher and Nevis 1983, National Assembly Elections Act, Cap 2.01; Saint Lucia — Constitution of Saint Lucia 1978, Elections Act, Cap 1.02; Trinidad and Tobago — Constitution of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago 1976, Representation of the People Act, Cap 2:01; United Kingdom — Corrupt Practices (Municipal Elections) Act 1872 (35 & 36 Vict c 60), Parliamentary Elections Act 1868 (31 & 32 Vict c 125), Parliamentary Election Petition Rules 1868.
Bailey D and Norbury L, Bennion, Bailey and Norbury on Statutory Interpretation (8th edn, LexisNexis 2020); Barreto J-M, ‘Decolonial Thinking and the Quest for Decolonising Human Rights’ (2018) 46 Asian Journal of Social Science 484; Bisram V, ‘Impact of Ethnic Conflict on Development: A Case Study of Guyana’ (CUNY Academic Works 2015)
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations