The Agony of St Kitts, Nevis and Anguilla

Pages115-139
CHAPTER 7
It has been widely acknowledged that as long as the islands of St Kitts, Nevis and
Anguilla comprised a common political and administrative unit under the name of St
Kitts/Nevis/Anguilla, there was implicit in that formation a constitutional Gordian Knot.
As we shall see, Nevis has tried hard ever since 1882 to cut that knot and, more recently,
Anguilla successfully did just that. This chapter will show how at last Anguilla succeeded
and is now, in a manner of speaking, an ‘independent colony’. But a new and faster
constitutional Gordian knot was tied when St Kitts and Nevis entered into a novel type of
federation in September 1983 becoming at that time the last of the six Associated States in
the Commonwealth Caribbean to attain independence. We shall deal firstly with Anguilla
and then address the constitutional position of the independent State of St Christopher (or
St Kitts) and Nevis.
A ANGUILLA – A HISTORY OF NEGLECT:
ITS EVENTUAL SECESSION AND BEYOND
Introduction
In a previous volume the author tried to convey to his readers that Anguilla had
experienced centuries of arbitrary buffeting from the Colonial Office and almost total
neglect from all quarters.1The record shows that at the time when the St Kitts Legislature
reluctantly agreed to have Anguilla annexed to St Kitts, one of the conditions laid down
was that the arrangement should entail no financial commitment by the larger colony
and, although this particular condition has never, to the knowledge of the author, been
specifically adverted to, St Kitts in fact did everything to fulfil the condition to the letter,
as the following further historical details relating to Anguilla will fully demonstrate.
During most of the 19th century, when communication between the two islands was
uncertain and irregular, Anguilla usually had as its representative in the Legislature a
Kittitian with neither knowledge of, interest in, or commitment to the affairs of Anguilla;
and the writer has been informed by a former Premier of the State that, as late as 1937,
Anguilla was represented by an Anguillan who was resident in St Kitts and was, in fact,
in charge of a sugar plantation there. He would visit Anguilla about once a year.
A short historical summary2
From 1825 until the end of that century the chief official of Anguilla was a stipendiary
magistrate who was paid from imperial funds. He combined the functions of President of
115
THE AGONY OF ST KITTS, NEVIS AND ANGUILLA
1 See Phillips, 1977, Chapter IX, pp 98–106.
2 Once more I express my indebtedness to Mr Anthony Phillips, senior lecturer in history at the
University of the West Indies, for having permitted to me to draw upon his work for the [contd]
the Vestry with dispenser of medicines. The then Vestry comprised the stipendiary
magistrate, the rector of the Anglican church (ex officio) and 11 members elected by male
inhabitants paying rates and taxes. The Vestry had power to impose rates and taxes; to
supervise the maintenance of public roads; to regulate the salaries of public officers and
generally to deal with local matters. In so far as a civil service was concerned, there was at
that time a small number of public officers in the island operating by prescription.
According to the Colonial Office records, the Anguillans displayed little evidence of
civilisation and they continued ‘to dream life away without a thought and without a care
in a state of perfect happiness’, in conditions of semi-barbarism.3
The Anguillan Court in its summary jurisdiction was presided over by the local
stipendiary and a justice of the peace chosen from the total local commission, which
comprised four justices of the peace. The magistrate also presided alone over a petty debt
court. High Court matters were dealt with by the Chief Justice of St Kitts, who was paid
an additional fee from imperial funds for this service. It should therefore come as no
surprise to hear that during the 19th century there were many complaints from Anguilla
concerning difficulties and delays in securing judicial remedies on the island. One
interesting case was that of William Flemming, a landowner resident in England, who
experienced considerable difficulty in recovering lands which were in possession of
tenants as licencees. He was finally able to secure redress and to enter into possession of
his lands in 1863 after a delay of three years, during which time the court had in fact not
sat at all. Thereafter, a provision was made for an annual sitting of the High Court
whether or not any case appeared on the list.
Life must have been dismal, too, for the stipendiaries, as is evident from two cases. In
1853, it was necessary to remove one Pickwood (who had served in this capacity in
Anguilla for many years) to one of the two magisterial districts of St Kitts proper, because
it was discovered that the utter solitude of the place had had a most deleterious effect
upon his mental, no less than his physical, health. It was then arranged that one of the
other St Kitts magistrates should be sent to Anguilla whenever emergencies arose and
especially during the absence of the rector.
After Pickwood’s death, it was decided that Dr Isidor Dyett, formerly in temporary
charge of the Virgin Islands, should be appointed to Anguilla. Dyett’s reaction was
violent. He bemoaned the fact that his 32 years of faithful public service should not be
considered worthy of ‘some better fate, some happier lot, than that of a hopeless
immolation at a place like Anguilla’.4
When Pickwood died in 1862 and before Dyett’s appointment Benjamin Pine,
Lieutenant Governor of St Kitts, had visited Anguilla to urge the candidature of
Richardson, the senior JP, as stipendiary. He also then took the opportunity to make two
additional proposals, viz:
(a) that an independent executive authority should be set up on the island; and
Commonwealth Caribbean Constitutional Law
116
2 [contd] historical data in the following pages stating the position in Anguilla up to 1871, from an
unpublished thesis presented to the University of London for an MA degree.
3 See CO 239/99, June 1856, No 22.
4 Phillips, 1977, p 253.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex