Summary of Daniel Ramlagan, substituted herein by Ramkumarie Ramlagan by order of Court dated 28th day of January 2009 Appellant v Narine Singh, substituted herein by Saiojine Singh by order of Court dated 17th day of December, 2013 Respondent

JurisdictionCaribbean States
JudgeThe Honourables Mr Justice Nelson,Mr Justice Wit,Mr Justice Hayton,Mr Justice Anderson,Mme Justice Rajnauth-Lee
Judgment Date29 June 2015
Neutral Citation[2015] CCJ 7 AJ
Docket NumberCCJ Appeal No 011 of 2013
CourtCaribbean Court of Justice
Date29 June 2015

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Chandra Ramotar Singh v Bhagwantlall Mossai
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Court of Justice (Appellate Jurisdiction)
    • 6 February 2019
    ... ... [2019] CCJ 1 (AJ) IN THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Appellate Jurisdiction ... Chandra Ramotar Singh Appellant and Bhagwantlall Mossai st Respondent Alvin Alves Second Respondent ... by Brooms J, Commissioner of Title, on 14 January 1997. Thereafter transport No. 316 of 1999 was ... year 2000 on behalf of Mossai seeking an order for possession against Singh. This action was ... appeal by an Order of the Court of Appeal dated 31 July 2017 and entered on 4 August 2017. He ... addition, as this Court pointed out in Ramlagan v Singh 15 the passing of transport did not ... 36 In Campbell v Narine 27 this Court accepted that although a party ... order of the Court of Appeal dated 21 December 2016 is hereby set aside ... [2019] CCJ 1 (AJ) (Summary) IN THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE ... ...
  • Bibi Zarida Applicant v Omeshwar Misir Respondent
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Court of Justice (Appellate Jurisdiction)
    • 23 August 2016
    ... ... [2016] CCJ 19 (AJ) IN THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Appellate Jurisdiction ON ... Court of Justice Act 2004 and for an order that the hearing of this application be treated ... of the Committee in written reasons dated April 6 2010 made it clear that his Committee had ... On December 30 2010 Mr Massabally filed his Defence and ... “the status quo appears to be that the appellant was in possession”, and “it does appear that ... be noted, however, that, as clear from Ramlagan v Singh5, a title holder is not entitled to the ... fundamental point made clear in Ramlagan v Singh that if the Applicant as claimed had been ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT