Smith v Selby

JurisdictionCaribbean States
JudgeThe Right Honourable Sir Dennis Byron,Wit,Hayton,Rajnauth-Lee,Barrow
Judgment Date01 September 2017
Neutral Citation[2017] CCJ 13 AJ
Docket NumberCCJ Application No. BBCV2017/002
CourtCaribbean Court of Justice (Appellate Jurisdiction)
Date01 September 2017

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Commissioner of Police v Stephen Alleyne
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Court of Justice
    • 1 February 2022
    ...3 WLR 1076; R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] 2 WLR 692; Sakshi v Union of India [2005] 2 LRC 111; Smith v Selby [2017] CCJ 13 (AJ) (BB), (2017) 91 WIR 70; SW v United Kingdom (1996) 21 EHRR 363; The Queen v Flowers [2020] CCJ 16 (AJ) BZ, [2020] 5 LRC 628; Wik Peoples ......
  • Novel Blaze Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Chance Talent Management Ltd
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Court of Appeal (British Virgin Islands)
    • 16 April 2021
    ...of section 9(2) of the Insolvency Act, and is therefore disqualified from pursuing an application to wind up Novel Blaze. Smith v Selby [2017] CCJ 13 (AJ) applied; Joseph Cadette v Saint Lucia Motor and General Insurance Co. Limited [2021] ECSCJ No. 472 (delivered 22 nd February 2021) follo......
  • Joseph Cadette v St. Lucia Motor & General Insurance Company Ltd
    • St Lucia
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Lucia)
    • 22 February 2021
    ...9 and 11 of the Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Act, Cap. 8.02, Revised Laws of Saint Lucia applied; Smith v Selby [2017] CCJ 13 (AJ) applied; Attorney General of the Turks and Caicos Islands v Misick and Others [2020] UKPC 30 applied; The Labour Tribunal v St. Lucia Electrici......
  • The Labour Tribunal v St. Lucia Electricity Services Ltd
    • St Lucia
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Lucia)
    • 8 April 2020
    ...Sussex Peerage Case (1884) 8 ER 1034 applied; Duport Steels Ltd and others v Sirs and others [1980] 1 All ER 529 applied; Smith v Selby [2017] CCJ 13 (AJ) applied; Re Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27 not followed. 3. The interpretation of section 22 advanced by LUCELEC accords wit......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT