Romero (Julio) and Macrado (Oscar) v R
| Jurisdiction | Caribbean States |
| Judgment Date | 1994 |
| Date | 1994 |
| Year | 1994 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Eastern Caribbean States) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...the focus of the summation by the judge related to blackmail and possession. Villa Cay Marina Ltd. v Acland (1996) 52 WIR 238 and Romero and Macrado v R (1994) 46 WIR 151 considered. (2) Where the case involves circumstantial evidence, the only concern of the judge is whether a reasonabl......
-
Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...the focus of the summation by the judge related to blackmail and possession. Villa Cay Marina Ltd. v Acland (1996) 52 WIR 238 and Romero and Macrado v R (1994) 46 WIR 151 considered. (2) Where the case involves circumstantial evidence, the only concern of the judge is whether a reasonabl......
-
Maduro v The Queen
...by the judge related to blackmail and possession. Villa Cay Marina Ltd. v. Acland (1996) 52 W.I.R. 238 and Romero and Macrado v. R (1994) 46 WIR 151 considered. (2) Where the case involves circumstantial evidence, the only concern of the judge is whether a reasonable jury could reach a conc......
-
[1] Kashif Mustaphakhan [2] Derek Parke Appellants v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
...of Public Prosecutions the Crown was relying on the elasticity in the concept of possession in accordance with the decisions in Romero and Macrado v R3; and The State v Gomes and Gomez4. 34 In the former case, Chief Justice Sir Vincent Floissac stated: "Where a crime (e.g. unlawful possessi......
Request a trial to view additional results