Ramkishun v Fung-Kee-Fung and Others

JurisdictionCaribbean States
Judgment Date2010
Date2010
CourtCaribbean Court of Justice (Appellate Jurisdiction)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Kwang and Murray v Yokkei
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Court of Justice
    • May 20, 2016
    ...is impossible to define within strict parameters. Section 22(1) contained no definition of the term, but in its earlier decision of Ramkishun v. Fung Kee Fung, [ [2010] CCJ 3 (AJ); (2010) 76 W.I.R. 328.] the Court, per Wit, J. CCJ., had observed that the term ‘fraud’ as used in section 22(......
  • Babulall v Public Trustee; Harry v Public Trustee
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Court of Justice
    • July 27, 2015
    ...of a purchase price, are not recognized: Ramdass v. Jairam (2008) 72 W.I.R. 270; Ross v. Sinclair (No. 2) (2009) 75 W.I.R. 343 and Ramkishun v. Fung Kee-Fung, a purchaser is entitled, to seek an order for specific performance. Thus the Court held that the respondent was estopped from treati......
  • Kwang and another v Yokkei
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Court of Justice (Appellate Jurisdiction)
    • May 20, 2016
    ...is impossible to define within strict parameters. Section 22(1) contained no definition of the term, but in its earlier decision of Ramkishun v Fung Kee Fung, 2 the Court, per Wit JCCJ, had observed that the term ‘fraud’ as used in section 22(1) of the Act had a wide meaning. The Court held......
  • Chandra Babulall Applicant v Public Trustee in her capacity as the duly appointed Administratrix of the Estate of Mary Chan, Deceased Respondent Winston Harry Applicant v Public Trustee in her capacity as the duly appointed Administratrix of the Estate of Mary Chan, Deceased Respondent
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Court of Justice (Appellate Jurisdiction)
    • May 19, 2015
    ...Court in the cases ofRamdass v Jairam (2008) 72 WIR 270;15Ross v Sainclair (No. 2) (2009) 75 WIR 34316 and Ramkishun v Fung Kee-Fung (2010) 76 WIR 32817 which establish that, unlike the common law, equitable interests in land are not recognized under the Roman-Dutch system of land law in Gu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT