R v Grazette
| Jurisdiction | Caribbean States |
| Judgment Date | 2009 |
| Date | 2009 |
| Court | Caribbean Court of Justice (Appellate Jurisdiction) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Chris Brooks v R
...raise a reasonable doubt about the exhibit's integrity.’ (See also R v Larsen [2001] BCSC 597, per Romilly J, at paras [61] — [66]; and Grazette v R [2009] CCJ 2 (AJ), at para. [43].) 46 It follows from this statement of the legal position, which we accept and adopt, that the purpose of est......
-
Easton Blake v R
...Magistrates' Criminal Appeal No 23/1991, judgment delivered 31 July 1991 and William Francis v Regina [2010] JMCA Crim 39. Relying on R v Grazette (2009) 74 WIR 92, counsel further submitted that the presence of gaps or discrepancies in the chain of custody is not necessarily fatal to the ......
-
Garland Marriott v R
... ... 22 On this point, the learned Director of Public Prosecutions, Miss Llewellyn QC, brought to our attention the cases of Grazette v R [2009] CCJ 2 (AJ) (delivered 3 April 2009), Hodge v R HCRAP 2009/001 (delivered 10 November 2010) and Francis v R [2010] JMCA Crim 68 (delivered 22 October 2010). In all of those cases, breaks in the chain of custody were held not to be fatal to the prosecution's case. The learned ... ...
-
Edward Bitter v R
...necessarily fatal, citing in support the cases of: (i) R v Larsen (2001) BCSC 597; (ii) Chris Brooks v R paragraphs [45] to [46]; (iii) Grazette v R (2009) 74 WIR 92, [2009] CCJ 2 (AJ), (judgment delivered 3 April 2009) ; (iv) Damian Hodge v R HCRAP 2009/001 (judgment delivered 10 November......
1 books & journal articles
-
Five years of CCJ's contribution to Caribbean Jurisprudence
...officer refreshed his memory from such a record for the purpose of giving evidence of an oral admission by 32 [2009] CCJ 1 (AJ), 33 (2009)74 WIR 92* 34 (2009) 74 WIR 108. the accused. The document from which he refreshed his memory was not put into evidence. The Court held that there was no......