Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry v Alleyne
Jurisdiction | Caribbean States |
Judgment Date | 2011 |
Date | 2011 |
Court | Caribbean Court of Justice (Appellate Jurisdiction) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Belmopan Land Development Corporation Ltd v The Attorney General of Belize
...UGHCLD 21; Goold v Commonwealth of Australia (1993) 114 ALR 135; Griffith City Council v Polegato (1990) 20 NSWLR 696; Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry v Alleyne [2011] CCJ 5 (AJ) (GY), (2011) 77 WIR 303; Guyana Sugar Corporation v Dukhi [2016] CCJ 17 AJ (GY); Heaney v Kirkby [2015] UKUT......
-
Ganga Charran Singh Appellant v Ram Singh and Rajcoomarie Singh Respondents
...witness box, such evidence is admitted as part of the evidence in the proceedings, as explained in detail by this Court in Guyana Bank for Trade & Industry v Alleyne7and in Sheermohammed v S A Nabi & Sons Limited. 8 The reason is that the judge with his extensive experience of law and life ......
-
Amin (t/a Amin Lumber Enterprise) Guyana Oil Company Ltd
...contents given that those were never challenged by Mr. Amin. See: Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry v. Alleyne [2011] CCJ 5 (AJ), (2011) 77 W.I.R. 303 [56] – [62] and also Sheermohammed and Another v. S S Nabi and Sons Ltd. [2011] CCJ 7 (AJ), (2011) 78 W.I.R. 364 [38] – [39]. The letter ......
-
Feizal Mohamed Amin, trading under the name, style and firm of Amin Lumber Enterprise Appellant v Guyana Oil Company Ltd, a company incorporated in Guyana under the Companies Act Chapter 89:01 and continued under the Companies Act 1991 with its registered office situate at Lot 166 Waterloo Street, Georgetown Respondent
...full cognisance of its contents given that those were never challenged by Mr Amin.See: Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry v Alleyne (2011) 77 WIR 3038 and also Sheermohammed and Another v S S Nabi and Sons Ltd. (2011) 78 WIR 3649 The letter was a statement adverse to the maker's interest an......