Baldeo Dihal v R
| Jurisdiction | Caribbean States |
| Judgment Date | 1960 |
| Date | 1960 |
| Year | 1960 |
| Court | Federal Supreme Court (West Indies) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
25 cases
-
R v Singh et Al
...error of omission. The methodology employed by the trial judge in the instant matter was deprecated by the Federal Supreme Court in Baldeo Dihal v. The Queen, (1960) 2 W.I.R. 282, a case of murder. In that cage it was necessary for the trial judge to direct the jury on the questions of sel......
-
Delano Smith Appellant v R Respondent [ECSC]
...apply that law to the contesting versions of the facts that had emerged during the case." Sing JA went on to citeBaldeo Dichal v R (1960) 2 WIR 28211, where it was held that "on a trial of a person charged with murder the judge should relate the law to the facts in the case." 40 There is an......
-
R v Henrigues et Al
...regarding the likelihood of the summing-up confusing the jury where them has been an excess of direction in law. In Balded Dihal v. R. (1960) 2 W.I.R. 282, the judge had directed the jury on the, relevance and importance of cooling time as an ingredient of provocation. This direction was gi......
- The State v Solomon
Get Started for Free