Alfred v Thomas and Another
| Jurisdiction | Caribbean States |
| Judgment Date | 1983 |
| Date | 1983 |
| Year | 1983 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Eastern Caribbean States) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Mitcham Black Claimant v Attorney General of Saint Lucia CPR. 451 Bernard Darcheville Defendants [ECSC]
...into account, kept in mind the various heads under which damages might be awarded and apply the correct principles: Berridge J.A. inAlfred v Thomas.8 But Singh J.A. in Fenton Auguste case warned at page 7 of the judgment that 'the practice of non-itemization should only be used where it is ......
-
Debbie Powell v Bulk Liquid Carriers Ltd and Others
...that the appellant was not a passenger of the vehicle, but another road user. The position of a passenger was explained in Alfred v Thomas and Another (1983) 32 WIR 183 at pages 188–189, which will be discussed below. 53 The law, prior to Lister, also exempted the owner of a vehicle, even i......
-
Fenton Auguste Appellant v Francis Neptune Respondent [ECSC]
...of $55,000 under the different heads. The learned judge in declining to do so seemed to have been following what Berridge JA said in Alfred v Thomas (1983) 32 WIR 183at p 187: " I pause here to state, however, that there is no obligation on the part of a judge to mention arithmetical calcul......
-
R.E.M.S. Company Ltd Appellant v Kevin Frett Respondent
...even purportedly on company business, is acting outside the scope of his employment. In support of this contention, he referred to Alfred v Thomas and Another (1983) 32 W.l.R. 183. Mr. Bennett argued that it is either the respondent and Hull had stolen the vehicle or the latter was driving ......
Request a trial to view additional results